Likert scale on social networking

Ordinal measures and the use of descriptive and inferential statistics Likert scales fall within the ordinal level of measurement: For example, Rosen et al. Five additional questions queried Facebook users on the number of friends on Facebook, the number of Facebook friends known in person, the number of people met online but never met in person, the number of people regularly interacting with online but never met in person and the number of close friends online never met in person.

Given the reliability and validity results, the new Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale was suggested as a method of measuring media and technology involvement across a variety of types of research studies either as a single item scale or any subset of the 15 subscales.

Similar results were found for all time estimates suggesting that users are not accurate at estimating time they spend on the computer. Following this self-reported time, monitoring software was installed on their computers and their actual use of these websites was evaluated over a one-month period.

A recent study by Moreno et al. Deciding which descriptive and inferential statistics may legitimately be used to describe and analyze the data obtained from a Likert scale is a controversial issue.

Eighteen items were included to assess attitudes toward technology with responses on a five-point Likert scale strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, strongly disagree.

These figures match the census figures for the Los Angeles area U. The Likert scale is named for American social scientist Rensis Likertwho devised the approach in Through a literature search and pilot studies performed by the researchers, a wide variety of constructs were gathered about the use of technology which was, through focus groups, streamlined to include 50 items that spanned usage of all major technologies on a variety of standard devices.

Moreover, Likert-derived data may fail to meet other assumptions for parametric tests e. Variations include presenting the subject with a question rather than a statement. Participants In both studies participants were required to be at least 18 years of age. However, perhaps the subject was not participating wholeheartedly and simply checked the same response category for each item.

A subject who strongly agreed with all such statements would be presumed to have a very positive view about the benefits of this method of health education.

For the sleep study participants completed an online survey without any incomplete or missing data.

Likert scales are widely used in social and educational research. Validity scales Additional validity items were collected in the sleep study that allowed for the assessment of the validity of the MTUAS. In addition, Carrier et al.

These included the following: The categories of response are mutually exclusive and usually cover the full range of opinion. Traditionally, researchers have employed a five-point scale e.

Directionality of Likert scales A feature of Likert scales is their directionality: Factor structure of the Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale MTUAS The 50 media usage items were subjected to a varimax-rotated factor analysis using the assumption that the factors would and should be intercorrelated as they all represent uses of similar technologies.

Treating Likert-derived data as ordinal, the median or mode generally is used as the measure of central tendency.

When using Likert scales, the researcher must consider issues such as categories of response values in the scalesize of the scale, direction of the scale, the ordinal nature of Likert-derived data, and appropriate statistical analysis of such data.

The advent of portable technology—including MP3 players, smartphones and other wireless mobile devices—changed the landscape so that nearly any activity that can be performed on a desktop or laptop machine can also be performed on a small, pocket size device.Likert scale is applied as one of the most fundamental and frequently used psychometric tools in educational and social sciences research.

Simultaneously, it is. Nov 01,  · Given the reliability and validity results, the new Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale was suggested as a method of measuring media and technology involvement across a variety of types of research studies either as a single item scale or any subset of the 15 subscales.

Likert-Type Scale Response AnchorsCitation: Vagias, Wade M. (). Likert-type scale response anchors.

The Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale: An empirical investigation

Clemson International Institute for Touri. Using a sample of emerging adults in college, exploratory factor analysis was conducted with a calibration sample of participants and confirmatory factor analysis was conducted using an equal hold-out sample to yield a final item two-factor Social Media Use Integration Scale (SMUIS).

Likert scales are widely used in social and educational research. When using Likert scales, the researcher must consider issues such as categories of response (values in the scale), size of the scale, direction of the scale, the ordinal nature of Likert-derived data, and appropriate statistical analysis of such data.

Likert scale

What questions and answers can be included for a survey on "Social Network usage in everyday life"? any way of analyzing the Likert scale in SPSS. to consider social networking as a.

Download
Likert scale on social networking
Rated 5/5 based on 4 review